A report on Shah Jahan, Aurangzeb and Lahore
He held administrative and military posts under his father Shah Jahan ((r.
- AurangzebThis nomination led to a succession crisis among his three sons, after which Shah Jahan's third son Aurangzeb ((r.
- Shah JahanHe was born on 5 January 1592 in Lahore, in modern-day Pakistan, as the ninth child and third son of Prince Salim (later known as 'Jahangir' upon his accession) by his wife, Jagat Gosain.
- Shah JahanIn June 1626, after an unsuccessful rebellion by his father, eight-year-old Aurangzeb and his brother Dara Shikoh were sent to the Mughal court in Lahore as hostages of their grandfather Jahangir and his wife, Nur Jahan, as part of their father's pardon deal.
- AurangzebJahangir's son, Shah Jahan reigned between 1628 and 1658 and was born in Lahore in 1592.
- LahoreShah Jahan's son, and last of the great Mughal Emperors, Aurangzeb, further contributed to the development of Lahore.
- Lahore2 related topics with Alpha
Mughal Empire
1 linksEarly-modern empire that controlled much of South Asia between the 16th and 19th centuries.
Early-modern empire that controlled much of South Asia between the 16th and 19th centuries.
This imperial structure lasted until 1720, until shortly after the death of the last major emperor, Aurangzeb, during whose reign the empire also achieved its maximum geographical extent.
There was more conspicuous consumption among the Mughal elite, resulting in greater patronage of painting, literary forms, textiles, and architecture, especially during the reign of Shah Jahan.
These were the cities of Agra, Delhi, Lahore, and Fatehpur Sikri.
Akbar
1 linksThe third Mughal emperor, who reigned from 1556 to 1605.
The third Mughal emperor, who reigned from 1556 to 1605.
Akbar and his forces occupied Lahore and then seized Multan in the Punjab.
There was only a transient occupation of the two provinces by the Mughals under his grandson, Shah Jahan, in the mid-17th century.
Historian Mubarak Ali, while studying the image of Akbar in Pakistani textbooks, observes that Akbar "is conveniently ignored and not mentioned in any school textbook from class one to matriculation", as opposed to the omnipresence of emperor Aurangzeb.