A report on Miller v. California
Landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court modifying its definition of obscenity from that of "utterly without socially redeeming value" to that which lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value".
- Miller v. California15 related topics with Alpha
Obscenity
3 linksAny utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time.
Any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time.
In the United States, the 1973 ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller v. California established a three-tiered test to determine what was obscene—and thus not protected, versus what was merely erotic and thus protected by the First Amendment.
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
6 linksEstablishment of religion, or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
Establishment of religion, or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
The Roth test was expanded when the Court decided Miller v. California (1973).
List of landmark court decisions in the United States
2 linksLandmark court decisions in the United States change the interpretation of existing law.
Landmark court decisions in the United States change the interpretation of existing law.
Miller v. California, To be obscene, a work must fail the Miller test, which determines if it has any "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
Roth v. United States
3 linksLandmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the Constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment.
Landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the Constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment.
In Miller v. California (1973), a five-person majority agreed for the first time since Roth as to a test for determining constitutionally unprotected obscenity, thereby superseding the Roth test.
Jacobellis v. Ohio
3 linksUnited States Supreme Court decision handed down in 1964 involving whether the state of Ohio could, consistent with the First Amendment, ban the showing of the Louis Malle film The Lovers (Les Amants), which the state had deemed obscene.
United States Supreme Court decision handed down in 1964 involving whether the state of Ohio could, consistent with the First Amendment, ban the showing of the Louis Malle film The Lovers (Les Amants), which the state had deemed obscene.
The Court's obscenity jurisprudence would remain fragmented until 1973's Miller v. California.
I know it when I see it
3 linksColloquial expression by which a speaker attempts to categorize an observable fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters.
Colloquial expression by which a speaker attempts to categorize an observable fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters.
This changed in 1973 with Miller v. California.
Supreme Court of the United States
1 linksHighest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.
Highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.
Miller v. California (1973, obscenity)
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
2 linksU.S. Supreme Court case which struck down two overbroad provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech".
U.S. Supreme Court case which struck down two overbroad provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 because they abridged "the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech".
In Miller v. California,, the Court had held that the First Amendment allowed the government to restrict obscenity.
Child pornography
2 linksPornography that unlawfully exploits children for sexual stimulation.
Pornography that unlawfully exploits children for sexual stimulation.
In response to New York v. Ferber,, a U.S. Supreme Court decision allowing the prohibition of child pornography even if it did not meet the obscenity standard established in Miller v. California, Congress passed the Child Protection Act of 1984, broadening the definition of child pornography and criminalizing nonprofit child pornography trafficking.
Community standards
0 linksOr is not obscene as explicated in the 1957RA Supreme Court decision in the matter of Roth v. United States.
Or is not obscene as explicated in the 1957RA Supreme Court decision in the matter of Roth v. United States.
The concept was further refined in the matter of Miller v. California in which the Court's adoption of the Miller test, also based upon community standards, had the opposite effect.